Terrorism, liberty and a question of liberty

Terrorism, liberty and a question of liberty
Last updated at 22:51pm on 13th April 2008
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_article_id=559477&in_page_id=1787

It is no coincidence that Home Secretary Jacqui Smith chose this weekend to warn - in a tabloid newspaper interview - that the Islamist terror threat to the British way of life is "severe and growing".

With Parliament soon to decide on her proposal that detention without charge in terror cases should increase from a maximum of 28 days to 42, she was giving rebellious Labour MPs an unsubtle reminder of where their loyalties lie.

She had nothing new to say but the message was clear - support this Bill or you are soft on terrorism and the blood of future victims may be on your hands.
Oh no, she is playing a new guilt trip card


Home Secretary Jacqui Smith: Islamist terror threat is 'severe and growing'

But is this really true? Surely only the most slavish of her colleagues will swallow Miss Smith's hollow arguments.

For example, why 42 days? Why not 90, as the Government first wanted, or seven as it was until 2003, or 56, as was floated last year, or 14, as it was before 2006. Indeed why not 28 days, as it is now?

Since the 28-day limit was introduced, there is no evidence that any terror investigation has been hampered because charges had to be brought prematurely, and even the police - though broadly in favour - are not pushing for the extension with any zeal.

Senior Government law officers are opposed, some believing that such Draconian legislation targeting one section of the community might create more terrorists than it catches.

Everyone understands the seriousness of the terror threat and when society is under attack from within, civil liberties inevitably suffer.

However, that does not mean they should be surrendered lightly - or, worst of all, for short-term political gain.

Miss Smith knows that if the Bill falls, it will be a calamity for the Prime Minister.
that would be better than her bill
As the latest polls show Mr Brown less popular even than Neville Chamberlain following his humiliation by the Nazis, a Commons defeat might quickly lead to an issue of confidence.
that took some doing, well deserved methinks

There are already mutterings about threats to his leadership.

I would rather hear the sound of the gallow makers at work than mutterings

So, in order to balm her party's selfinflicted wounds, Miss Smith is prepared to manipulate the fears of both the public and her colleagues to drive through a piece of ill-conceived and muddled legislation.

In any circumstances this would be cynical in the extreme.

When individual liberties and the defence of the realm are involved, it is nothing short of disgraceful.
Try treason, much more accurate



Licence to flout law

If you are a normally law-abiding motorist who happens to stray into a bus lane, be ten minutes late back to your parking meter, or be caught on speed camera doing five mph over the limit, the chances are you will be pursued quickly and with the full rigour of the law.

If you are part of the underclass of two million rogue drivers, without tax, insurance, and frequently even a licence, you are likely to enjoy many years of trouble-free motoring.
Underclass, who would that be?
Figures showing there are 63 per cent more tax evaders now than in 1999, yet only half as many successful prosecutions will leave most motorists speechless with impotent rage.

Only one in 20 tax-evaders is ever prosecuted.

With the proliferation of spy cameras under this overbearing, snooping Government - not to mention some deluded chief constables who seem to think hounding decent motorists is a higher priority than tackling crime - car drivers are oppressed as never before.
dont pay any tax I say
The least they are entitled to expect is that some of the billions extorted from them every year for trivial offences should be spent on pursuing those drivers who really make our roads unsafe.
Thats your road tax going up to pay for it then. More extortion, good idea.
But then, that might seem far too much like hard work.