What is treason exactly? Why is it so important that it is more vile than murder? Who brings charges of treason?
I have been looking into this matter of treason and trying to answer these questions.
If treason has been committed by the powers temporally in charge of running the affairs of the nation , how does a nation put a stop to it?
From the following article by Booker it seems treason has been committed. How does one go about bringing the case to court, and can it be brought about on legal aid?
http://www.britsattheirbest.com/
What is this poison? Of course there is a British Constitution
Matthew Parris recently wrote, “We are not hugely interested in constitutions. That’s why we don’t have one.”
What is this poison that drips incessantly into the public veins?
John Adams, a U.S. President and drafter of the American Constitution, called the English Constitution “the most stupendous fabric of human invention” in all history.
OF COURSE THE BRITISH PEOPLE HAVE A CONSTITUTION.
THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION IS PLAINLY VISIBLE IN THE COMMON LAW established by Alfred the Great in 871 and developed by British people for the next thousand years. The Common Law incorporates the Charter of Liberties (1100), which makes the Sovereign subject to the Common Law. It incorporates the Council of Westminster (1102), which ended slavery in England. It specifically states that any slave who sets foot in England becomes instantly free (Cartwright, 1569). It defends property rights and the right to be secure in one own’s home (‘his home is his castle’). It plainly states that judges are to be guided by stare decisis, "standing by things decided" – the rulings of previous cases.
THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION IS PLAINLY VISIBLE IN THE ACT OF SETTLEMENT, 1701, which states that the Common Law is the Birthright of the people and may never be taken away.
THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION IS PLAINLY VISIBLE IN MAGNA CARTA, which established that justice would not be sold, refused or delayed, that habeas corpus is our right, that if we are accused of a crime we have the right to a jury trial, and that we will be protected from fines so large that they consumed our livelihood.
The right to a jury trial is essential because it places justice in the hands of citizens, not of the state. Crucially, a jury always has the right to give a not guilty verdict even if it runs counter to the interpretation or logic of statute (Parliamentary) law. Thus the people have the power to decide that a law is unjust and overturn it.
THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION IS PLAINLY VISIBLE IN THE CORONATION OATH, which is the covenant between the British sovereign and the people of Britain. If the people freely and willingly affirm their Sovereign, the Sovereign in turn gives them a solemn promise - his or her Coronation Oath. First pledged by Edgar in 973, it binds King or Queen to deliver justice, equity, and mercy. Elizabeth II promised to uphold the respective laws and customs of the people of the United Kingdom.
THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION IS PLAINLY VISIBLE IN THE PEOPLE'S DECLARATION OF RIGHTS (1688) AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS (1689), when the Oath became an undoubted and express contract for the governing of Britain. Significantly this contract takes place not between Parliament and the Crown but between the people and the Crown.
This is why John Adams believed that the British people had brought “the great idea” of three separate branches of government described by Cicero to perfection. They had 1) an executive in the Crown, 2) a legislature in Parliament, and 3) an independent judiciary.
However, Adams warned that if the executive power is seized by “an aristocratical or democratical assembly, it will corrupt the legislature as necessarily as rust corrupts iron. . .and when the legislature is corrupted, the people are undone.”
This is exactly what has happened. Over the course of the 20th century, executive power has been taken by Parliament.
"It is the Sovereign’s duty to ensure redress and remedy and to protect the people. Should a breach of the Constitution arise through mishap or mischief it must be recognised as misgovernance and declared unconstitutional by the Sovereign." Yet today The Queen appears unable or unwilling to use her power of Royal Refusal and Royal Assent.
It may seem odd for an American, with an elected president, to see any positive qualities in an executive whose powers are inherited. But isn’t it a relief to have an executive who is not partisan, is not pushing for his party, who has a sense of history?
If the people agree to such an executive, and limit its powers, what is undemocratic about it? It may be eccentric or timeless or rich in ceremony, but it is not undemocratic, particularly when you consider that sovereigns who did not pass muster were sent packing, among them William II, John, Richard II, Richard III, Charles I, James II, and (by Brits in America) George III.
I have not mentioned the British right to bear arms (Bill of Rights 1689) or how the Common Law protects freedom of association, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and the right to silence, all won by extraordinary British men and women who were willing to die so that we might be free.
And for those interested in the EU, THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION IS PLAINLY VISIBLE IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS (1689), which states "That no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, preeminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm". According to the Bill of Rights, to give the EU authority over the British people is unconstitutional.
Yes, the written British Constitution is a bit long. But taking the essential parts I doubt you would find it much longer than the New Testament. It seems to me that if American John Adams could read and admire the British Constitution, the British might give it a try.
The British Constitution is plain and visible. It has been betrayed by the small men and women of Parliament and by those people who have yet to read it, stand up and defend it.
The Freedom Network and Your Own Choice have more.
May your week be good.
So we have from the above information a long history of legal protection, protections of the State and its peoples and on the other side a group of people who are removing those protections. Akin to robbery I would say. So surely there is a case to be made or is there.
Surely we have people capable of taking on this case, it would be the most important case in British law for more than a century. Is it not the case that law makers are obliged to up hold the constitution as it stands and are there to bring such cases to justice.
Sunday, 21 October 2007
Saturday, 20 October 2007
TRAITOR
Is there a political solution?
Reading this posted on the comment section of the Express there is'nt one.
http://www.express.co.uk/comments/viewall/22493
THE TYBURN TREE MAY FLOWER AGAIN!!
19.10.07, 8:34am
I read with a degree of wry amusement the assurance from Mr Broon that his "Red Lines" had been agreed and, therefore, we could all sleep soundly in our beds. One of these Red Lines was, according to The Great Leader, the preservation of our Justice System and Our Law Making Freedoms. Oh, Yeah? Not according to some VERY highly placed Constitutional experts. Read below to expose yet ANOTHER blatant lie from Broon.
In my researches on our Sovereignty and Constitution I had cause to write to Lord Falconer in August 2006 when he was Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs. I pointed out to him that, on the 29th September, The Rt.Hon.Alderman Sir Gavyn Arthur, then Lord Mayor of London, gave the 2003 "Denning Lecture" in Gray's Inn before a audience of distinguished and undoubtedly learned lawyers. His subject was "The City and the Law". As an introduction he gave a summary of our Common Law but then pointed out that there are TWO systems of law operating in the UK today and that since the enactment by Parliament of the ECA1972 there had been a quiet revolution in our legal system. He went on to say that it was not until the House of Lords handed down their judgement on the Factortame case that it became apparent that where English Law and the Law of the European Community(EC) conflicted that the EC Law prevailed. From that he drew the conclusion, (that had also been arrived at by many others that I can quote), that Parliament was no longer sovereign. (Sir Gavyn confirmed to me that there had been no dissent from his audience at his conclusion). From such a statement, and knowing that Parliament consists of Her Majesty the Queen who is the only person Sovereign in Parliament and the two Houses which are not sovereign of themselves, I could only draw the conclusion that the Queen had not been Sovereign since the moment She gave the ECA1972 the Royal Assent. She had effectively abdicated Her Sovereign status and surrendered up all constitutional power and authority on giving the ECA1972 the Royal Assent and the sovereignty of the British people had been surrendered to the EU. I was reluctant to draw such an awesome conclusion. I asked Falconer if he could confirm that I was wrong and that the Queen was still Sovereign and thus so was Parliament.
A Mr.J.Copeland replied on Falconer's behalf. This is what he wrote:
"I can confirm that the Queen is Head of State, Head of the Executive, Head of the Judiciary, Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the Crown and Supreme Governor of the Church of England. However, as a result of a long period of evolution the Monarch's absolute power has been progressively reduced. Minsters of the Crown in the name of the Sovereign govern the United Kingdom. The powers of the Crown, that is the Sovereign in Her constitutional capacity - are executed almost exclusively by Ministers. The enactment of the European Communities Act 1972 has not altered this.". In point of fact no British Monarch has had absolute power though many tried to exercise such power. It was to prevent such an attempt at absolute power that the Magna Carta was brought into being in 1215 and which is a foundation stone of our Constitution. Article 61 states specifically the power held by the people if the Monarch departs from the lawful way."
Copeland went on:
"However, as outlined in your letter, one of the most significant new sources of the British Constitution in recent years has been the EU. When Britain signed the Treaty of Rome and passed the European Communities Act 1972, the superiority of European Law was accepted, and parliament was no longer sovereign (although the UK can leave the EU any time it wishes). As a result, British Courts now have the power to review Acts of parliament and in the light of EU legislation, suspend Statute Law.". Again here we have an assumption of power by the EU, with the agreement of Parliament, to write our "Constitution" for us! Why is there no argument in the Commons regarding the constitutional treaty? All parties had agreed our subjugation to the EU in 1972.
The incongruities and constitutional errors in these two paragraphs are self evident. However they plainly point to the fact that the British are no longer a Sovereign, independent and self governing nation. That the Queen is no longer our Sovereign, ( She is now subject to the superiority of EU Law), as She became on the death of Her Father George VI; as She herself confirmed in Her Declaration of Sovereignty before Her Accession Privy Council on 8th.February 1952 ;and as we elected Her to be on Her Coronation in exchange for Her Coronation Oath in which She declared how She would govern us. Our Sovereignty has been removed from us by an act of High Treason. However this situation will undoubtedly gladden the hearts of all LibLabCon adherents as this is precisely what Sir Arnold Toynbee said was the objective of the Fabians Socialists in 1932 in Copenhagen. He is reported to have said:"If we are frank with ourselves, we shall admit that we are engaged on a deliberate and sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations upon the sovereignty and the independence of the fifty or sixty local sovereign independent States.... The surest sign... that this fetish of local national sovereignty is our intended victim is the emphasis with which all our statesmen and our publicists protest with one accord...at every step forward which we take...that the sacred principle of local sovereignty is really being encroached upon and its sphere of action reduced and its power for evil restricted. It is just because we are really attacking the principle of local sovereignty that we keep on protesting our loyalty to it so loudly.". In order to achieve the intended end he went to say "I will merely repeat that we are at present working discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And at all times we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be... ostracised and discredited.". It is also High Treason.
Therefore it would seem to me that in all honesty the Fabian Society and the LibLabCon Pro-EU traitors should now be cheering from the rooftops the final achievement of Sir Arnold's stated aims. What a scoop for The Daily Express to have a front page spread
"THE QUEEN ABDICATED ALL OF HER CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN 1972. BRITAIN NO LONGER SOVEREIGN, INDEPENDENT OR SELF-GOVERNING". However I suspect LibLabCon deceit long ingrained in their activities will prevent such an admission that they are the ones who engineered the destruction of our Constitutional Monarchy and, it would seem, with the tacit agreement of Elizabeth Windsor a.k.a. Queen Elizabeth II.
With thanks to David Bourne, scholar and patriot
• Posted by: BlackBuck • Report Comment
Reading this posted on the comment section of the Express there is'nt one.
http://www.express.co.uk/comments/viewall/22493
THE TYBURN TREE MAY FLOWER AGAIN!!
19.10.07, 8:34am
I read with a degree of wry amusement the assurance from Mr Broon that his "Red Lines" had been agreed and, therefore, we could all sleep soundly in our beds. One of these Red Lines was, according to The Great Leader, the preservation of our Justice System and Our Law Making Freedoms. Oh, Yeah? Not according to some VERY highly placed Constitutional experts. Read below to expose yet ANOTHER blatant lie from Broon.
In my researches on our Sovereignty and Constitution I had cause to write to Lord Falconer in August 2006 when he was Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs. I pointed out to him that, on the 29th September, The Rt.Hon.Alderman Sir Gavyn Arthur, then Lord Mayor of London, gave the 2003 "Denning Lecture" in Gray's Inn before a audience of distinguished and undoubtedly learned lawyers. His subject was "The City and the Law". As an introduction he gave a summary of our Common Law but then pointed out that there are TWO systems of law operating in the UK today and that since the enactment by Parliament of the ECA1972 there had been a quiet revolution in our legal system. He went on to say that it was not until the House of Lords handed down their judgement on the Factortame case that it became apparent that where English Law and the Law of the European Community(EC) conflicted that the EC Law prevailed. From that he drew the conclusion, (that had also been arrived at by many others that I can quote), that Parliament was no longer sovereign. (Sir Gavyn confirmed to me that there had been no dissent from his audience at his conclusion). From such a statement, and knowing that Parliament consists of Her Majesty the Queen who is the only person Sovereign in Parliament and the two Houses which are not sovereign of themselves, I could only draw the conclusion that the Queen had not been Sovereign since the moment She gave the ECA1972 the Royal Assent. She had effectively abdicated Her Sovereign status and surrendered up all constitutional power and authority on giving the ECA1972 the Royal Assent and the sovereignty of the British people had been surrendered to the EU. I was reluctant to draw such an awesome conclusion. I asked Falconer if he could confirm that I was wrong and that the Queen was still Sovereign and thus so was Parliament.
A Mr.J.Copeland replied on Falconer's behalf. This is what he wrote:
"I can confirm that the Queen is Head of State, Head of the Executive, Head of the Judiciary, Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the Crown and Supreme Governor of the Church of England. However, as a result of a long period of evolution the Monarch's absolute power has been progressively reduced. Minsters of the Crown in the name of the Sovereign govern the United Kingdom. The powers of the Crown, that is the Sovereign in Her constitutional capacity - are executed almost exclusively by Ministers. The enactment of the European Communities Act 1972 has not altered this.". In point of fact no British Monarch has had absolute power though many tried to exercise such power. It was to prevent such an attempt at absolute power that the Magna Carta was brought into being in 1215 and which is a foundation stone of our Constitution. Article 61 states specifically the power held by the people if the Monarch departs from the lawful way."
Copeland went on:
"However, as outlined in your letter, one of the most significant new sources of the British Constitution in recent years has been the EU. When Britain signed the Treaty of Rome and passed the European Communities Act 1972, the superiority of European Law was accepted, and parliament was no longer sovereign (although the UK can leave the EU any time it wishes). As a result, British Courts now have the power to review Acts of parliament and in the light of EU legislation, suspend Statute Law.". Again here we have an assumption of power by the EU, with the agreement of Parliament, to write our "Constitution" for us! Why is there no argument in the Commons regarding the constitutional treaty? All parties had agreed our subjugation to the EU in 1972.
The incongruities and constitutional errors in these two paragraphs are self evident. However they plainly point to the fact that the British are no longer a Sovereign, independent and self governing nation. That the Queen is no longer our Sovereign, ( She is now subject to the superiority of EU Law), as She became on the death of Her Father George VI; as She herself confirmed in Her Declaration of Sovereignty before Her Accession Privy Council on 8th.February 1952 ;and as we elected Her to be on Her Coronation in exchange for Her Coronation Oath in which She declared how She would govern us. Our Sovereignty has been removed from us by an act of High Treason. However this situation will undoubtedly gladden the hearts of all LibLabCon adherents as this is precisely what Sir Arnold Toynbee said was the objective of the Fabians Socialists in 1932 in Copenhagen. He is reported to have said:"If we are frank with ourselves, we shall admit that we are engaged on a deliberate and sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations upon the sovereignty and the independence of the fifty or sixty local sovereign independent States.... The surest sign... that this fetish of local national sovereignty is our intended victim is the emphasis with which all our statesmen and our publicists protest with one accord...at every step forward which we take...that the sacred principle of local sovereignty is really being encroached upon and its sphere of action reduced and its power for evil restricted. It is just because we are really attacking the principle of local sovereignty that we keep on protesting our loyalty to it so loudly.". In order to achieve the intended end he went to say "I will merely repeat that we are at present working discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And at all times we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be... ostracised and discredited.". It is also High Treason.
Therefore it would seem to me that in all honesty the Fabian Society and the LibLabCon Pro-EU traitors should now be cheering from the rooftops the final achievement of Sir Arnold's stated aims. What a scoop for The Daily Express to have a front page spread
"THE QUEEN ABDICATED ALL OF HER CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN 1972. BRITAIN NO LONGER SOVEREIGN, INDEPENDENT OR SELF-GOVERNING". However I suspect LibLabCon deceit long ingrained in their activities will prevent such an admission that they are the ones who engineered the destruction of our Constitutional Monarchy and, it would seem, with the tacit agreement of Elizabeth Windsor a.k.a. Queen Elizabeth II.
With thanks to David Bourne, scholar and patriot
• Posted by: BlackBuck • Report Comment
Wednesday, 3 October 2007
GET UP STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: dont give up the fight!
Preacherman, dont tell me,Heaven is under the earth.
I know you dont know What life is really worth.
Its not all that glitters is gold;alf the story has never been told:
So now you see the light, eh!Stand up for your rights. come on!
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: dont give up the fight!
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: dont give up the fight!
Most people think,Great God will come from the skies,
Take away everythingAnd make everybody feel high.
But if you know what life is worth,You will look for yours on earth:
and now you see the light,You stand up for your rights. jah!Get up, stand up! (jah, jah!)Stand up for your rights! (oh-hoo!)Get up, stand up! (get up, stand up!)Dont give up the fight! (life is your right!)
Get up, stand up! (so we cant give up the fight!)
Stand up for your rights! (lord, lord!)
Get up, stand up! (keep on struggling on!)
Dont give up the fight! (yeah!)
We sick an tired of-a your ism-skism game -Dyin n goin to heaven in-a jesus name, lord.
We know when we understand:Almighty God is a living man.
You can fool some people sometimes,But you cant fool all the people all the time.
So now we see the light (what you gonna do? ),
We gonna stand up for our rights! (yeah, yeah, yeah!)
So you better:Get up, stand up! (in the morning! git it up!)
Stand up for your rights! (stand up for our rights!)
Get up, stand up!Dont give up the fight!
Get up, stand up! (get up, stand up!)
Stand up for your rights! (get up, stand up!)
Get up, stand up! ( ... )Dont give up the fight!
(get up, stand up!)Get up, stand up! ( ... )Stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up!Dont give up the fight! / bob marley end
I remember these words, I was part of the scene at the time, I was 23 or 24 , I am jamaican born, living in jamaica at the time this song came out. Like Marley I have an English parent. He was shot at a few times, so was I. I watched the island change in a decade. Many people had to leave in a hurry, leaving behind a dream place to live. There was poverty but there was hope. There is dispair now, poverty is a lot worse, 2000 murders per year out of a population of 2.7 million.
How does that relate to Britain,
Politics, greedy, evil, unprincipaled, power hungry politics. People offered unrealistic, untrue and unworkable policies. Once that evil took hold it has been impossible to get back to a system of justice for all the people. Freedom, political freedom is gone. I was surprised how quickly it went, I am still feeling the effects today, people from many other countries have seen it go as well. Here in Britain we feel that it will never happen here, democracy is too strong, the people wont allow it, our politicians are patroitic, checks and balances etc..
From my time here in Britain since 1979 I can say that Britain is loosing their freedom. I never thought it would have been possible but it is well advanced. I defy anyone to do a normal days activities and see how many rules govern us here in Britain you break. It is almost impossible to be law adiding anymore, now the children are being oppressed as children. The State, cradle to the grave is in control. The laws are everywhere, in every thing you do, in the human rights act, in the anti terrorism laws, health and safety, but is there much justice or fairness?
Undemocratic PM, undemocratic EU, Undemocratic laws, unelected bodies and polical police. Certain legal political parties have to meet in secret here in the UK today.
We are maybe one election or treaty away from losing all of the laws accumalated by the experiences this country has gone through over hundreds of years for laws made without our consent.
When you will not fight when you can win, you may have to fight when there is no chance of winning. Freedom is not free, it needs to be fought for. There is always forces who will fight to take those freedoms from us and we must always be alert and ready to fight to hold on to our rights and freedom.
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: dont give up the fight!
Preacherman, dont tell me,Heaven is under the earth.
I know you dont know What life is really worth.
Its not all that glitters is gold;alf the story has never been told:
So now you see the light, eh!Stand up for your rights. come on!
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: dont give up the fight!
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up: dont give up the fight!
Most people think,Great God will come from the skies,
Take away everythingAnd make everybody feel high.
But if you know what life is worth,You will look for yours on earth:
and now you see the light,You stand up for your rights. jah!Get up, stand up! (jah, jah!)Stand up for your rights! (oh-hoo!)Get up, stand up! (get up, stand up!)Dont give up the fight! (life is your right!)
Get up, stand up! (so we cant give up the fight!)
Stand up for your rights! (lord, lord!)
Get up, stand up! (keep on struggling on!)
Dont give up the fight! (yeah!)
We sick an tired of-a your ism-skism game -Dyin n goin to heaven in-a jesus name, lord.
We know when we understand:Almighty God is a living man.
You can fool some people sometimes,But you cant fool all the people all the time.
So now we see the light (what you gonna do? ),
We gonna stand up for our rights! (yeah, yeah, yeah!)
So you better:Get up, stand up! (in the morning! git it up!)
Stand up for your rights! (stand up for our rights!)
Get up, stand up!Dont give up the fight!
Get up, stand up! (get up, stand up!)
Stand up for your rights! (get up, stand up!)
Get up, stand up! ( ... )Dont give up the fight!
(get up, stand up!)Get up, stand up! ( ... )Stand up for your rights!
Get up, stand up!Dont give up the fight! / bob marley end
I remember these words, I was part of the scene at the time, I was 23 or 24 , I am jamaican born, living in jamaica at the time this song came out. Like Marley I have an English parent. He was shot at a few times, so was I. I watched the island change in a decade. Many people had to leave in a hurry, leaving behind a dream place to live. There was poverty but there was hope. There is dispair now, poverty is a lot worse, 2000 murders per year out of a population of 2.7 million.
How does that relate to Britain,
Politics, greedy, evil, unprincipaled, power hungry politics. People offered unrealistic, untrue and unworkable policies. Once that evil took hold it has been impossible to get back to a system of justice for all the people. Freedom, political freedom is gone. I was surprised how quickly it went, I am still feeling the effects today, people from many other countries have seen it go as well. Here in Britain we feel that it will never happen here, democracy is too strong, the people wont allow it, our politicians are patroitic, checks and balances etc..
From my time here in Britain since 1979 I can say that Britain is loosing their freedom. I never thought it would have been possible but it is well advanced. I defy anyone to do a normal days activities and see how many rules govern us here in Britain you break. It is almost impossible to be law adiding anymore, now the children are being oppressed as children. The State, cradle to the grave is in control. The laws are everywhere, in every thing you do, in the human rights act, in the anti terrorism laws, health and safety, but is there much justice or fairness?
Undemocratic PM, undemocratic EU, Undemocratic laws, unelected bodies and polical police. Certain legal political parties have to meet in secret here in the UK today.
We are maybe one election or treaty away from losing all of the laws accumalated by the experiences this country has gone through over hundreds of years for laws made without our consent.
When you will not fight when you can win, you may have to fight when there is no chance of winning. Freedom is not free, it needs to be fought for. There is always forces who will fight to take those freedoms from us and we must always be alert and ready to fight to hold on to our rights and freedom.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
